Sent to you by moya via Google Reader:
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to i am elizah // blog using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
- Mrs. Pickles is the educated breadwinner, Stu often chasing his less profitable dreams
- Phil & Lil's mom, obvs (short hair, female symbol sweatshirt, clear second waver
- Charlotte, ballbusting CEO who wants Angelica to have an edge in a male-privileged world
- Suzie's family, upper-middle class black family with a really accomplished mom
- Chaz, sensitive single dad who childrears and has rejected traditional masculinity
Erica, I KNOW WHAT YOU WERE DOING.
ugly laughing
And people always wonder why early 90's cartoons »»>
Egypt has been all over the news lately, as Egyptians have lifted their voice in condemnation of despotic president, Hosni Mubarak. There are some key things to keep in mind as the events unfold:
1. Don't get it twisted: this is a revolution.
It has been called chaos, upheaval, civil unrest, an uprising, a challenge, a twitter revolution, a youth movement, and class warfare. Each category reduces the power of the people to come together to build a popular revolution, which requires coalition building to fight for connected interests and a common goal. Call it what it is: a revolution.
2. Women are a part of the revolution. Women are on the front lines protesting, organizing, and agitating for justice. This is a feminist issue.
As 8-year-old crunk-feminist-in-training Juju contends:
3. The USA has historically supported oppressive political regimes if they serve American military and economic interests. (See Haiti and the Dominican Republic for some examples close to home. See also Iraq and Afghanistan).
On their website, the U.S. Dept of State's entry on Egypt states: "The United States and Egypt enjoy a strong and friendly relationship based on shared mutual interest in Middle East peace and stability, revitalizing the Egyptian economy and strengthening trade relations, and promoting regional security…U.S. military cooperation has helped Egypt modernize its armed forces and strengthen regional security and stability."
While the article makes passing mention of the "significant restrictions on the political process and freedom of expression for non-governmental organizations," it largely praises the infamously rigged 2005 election, stating: "Progress was seen in the September 2005 presidential elections when parties were allowed to field candidates against President Mubarak and his National Democratic Party. In early 2005, President Mubarak proposed amending the constitution to allow, for the first time in Egypt's history, competitive, multi-candidate elections. An amendment was drafted by parliament and approved by public referendum in late May 2005. In September 2005, President Mubarak was reelected, according to official results, with 88% of the vote. His two principal challengers, Ayman Nour and No'man Gom'a, took 7% and 3% of the vote respectively."
To make a long story short, it has been a vested interest for the U.S. government to look the other way while Mubarak and his cronies ran an oppressive regime.
This vested interest continues as Egyptians far and wide are standing up in revolt. A recent article from the BBC News notes:
The United States is trying to steer Egypt away from revolution towards evolution. It is seeking a middle, managed course towards change. It does not want simply to dump an ally of 30 years, one who has stood by the treaty with Israel which is of great importance to US Middle East policy. But it is now signalling that President Hosni Mubarak's departure – if not now, then later – has to be part of that change.
You can see this in a shift of American language.
Last week, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the Egyptian government was 'stable and looking for ways to respond to the legitimate needs and interests of the Egyptian people.'
But by Sunday, she was calling for 'an orderly transition to a democratic government.'"
Side eye.
4. Despite popular belief, Egypt and Tunisia are real places in northern Africa.
In his speech January 28, President Obama talked about freedom movements in Asia, Europe, the United States – yes only the United States constitutes the Americas–Africa and the Arab world. Terms such as "the Arab World," " the Islamic states," and "the Middle East" work to oversimplify complex societies with diverse cultures and distinct histories, and these terms work to collapse countries into a totalizing US-versus-them binary that is unproductive for thinking about people's movements taking place across northern Africa. For example, there are elections taking place in Sudan and protests taking place in Algeria right now and knowing this can help us to contextualize, understand, and support the liberation movements happening in the region.
5. References to the Muslim Brotherhood, looters and thugs, and anarchy by Western news media reproduce orientalism and racism and discredit the revolution as a political movement. Paying attention to diction and rhetoric is not about splitting hairs or being "politically correct," lest we forget the "refugees" of Hurricane Katrina.
For more on Egypt, check out these resources:
Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/30/egypt-revolution-2011_n_8160…
Al Jazeera: http://blogs.aljazeera.net/middle-east/2011/01/29/live-blog-291-egypt…
Democracy Now!: http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2011/1/29/sharif_kouddous_reporting_…
Shout out to CF Aisha for compiling the data for this post!
"I felt so sad after that movie."
This was the response of a young woman who had seen the movie "Precious". I've seen "Precious" and so have many of my friends- the majority being college educated African/American females. But when it comes to Precious I feel anything but "sad." For one, it is my personal law never to pity another living thing. Your feeling sorry for someone else does solve the circumstances in which they are in. I can spend all my time feeling sorry for the homeless man, abused animals or that starving child in Africa but at the end fo the day their condition remains that same. In other words, to pity someone is to recognize and reinforce supremacy, inequality of power even on the most minuscule of terms. After seeing "Precious" for the first time, I not only felt a strong sense of hopelessness in reality but also a strong concern from how the movie would be interpreted, especially by those outside of the African American community. I had to point out (in class today) that Black pathology is strongly embedded in American history: the image of jezebels, aggressive black "bucks" raping white women, welfare queens, drug addicts, fatherless homes, imprisoned males, and ghettoes are all a part of a pathology that reinforce stereotypes and, ultimately, racism- all of which America still holds close to it's heart…precious. But these behavior issues continue to hurt black consciousness as well as white consciousness in America. What that young woman and the movie refused to recognize the structure that allows leeway for such atrocities to exist. Just like Ida B Wells' insisted through lynching campaign (Southern Horrors) that people- both black and white- are not looking at the institutions that allow such stereotypes to exist in truth. There is a systematic reason why blacks earn less than whites, why many of them are uneducated or why many are imprisoned. Ultimately, I believe that racism cannot (easily) be destroyed (an idea cannot be destroyed once it is planted in consciousness) but the truth can expose it's falsehoods. America has too long and continues to be a racist democracy, with racist institutions, racist systems and racist leaders (and I use the term racist to describe any person who believes and exhibits their race to be superior to that of another not only in through thought but in action as well). And the only way we can move past this- beyond the imprisonment, the inequality, the educational and housing neglect- is to aim to expose the truth- not just feel sad about it.
Kadiatou Tubman
yes.
absolutely gorgeous.
[image of a brown person in a field, full white skirt, gold headwrap, looking over their shoulder]
Democracy Now! | Headlines for January 28, 2011
NO democracy now! These proposals would not revoke citizenship of "Immigrant" children—they would revoke citizenship of US CITIZENS. They are NOT immigrants, they are US NATURAL BORN CITIZENS.
(p.s i appreciate the effort to find new language that is not dependent on "anchor babies"—but—there is no logic to the arguments to take citizenship away—and thus, that should be exposed. Instead of trying to make a white supremacist violent position make sense in a headline—just say—Nativists Propose New Citizenship Criteria. Or something like that.
(via radicallyhottoff)
Crunktastic's article is crossposted from our friends over at The Feminist Wire.
I find myself both intrigued and troubled by Ron Neal's recent TFW post, "Kanye West Is Not a Feminist, But…" Neal is absolutely spot on that Kanye displays a level of emotional vulnerability and complexity that is rare for Black male hip hop artists. But I would argue that this level of Black male vulnerability, while rare in Hip Hop, is actually a hallmark of serious Black male artists. And I do consider Kanye a serious artist, although I think this gives him a pass sometime to do ridiculous b.s. in the name of being a tortured soul.
I am reminded that as the range of Black creative traditions go, beautifully complex renderings of Black male subjectivity are a hallmark. In this regard, the literary triumvirate of James Baldwin, Ralph Ellison and Richard Wright immediately come to mind. Thinking of them, I am also reminded of the infamous interview between James Baldwin and Audre Lorde in the 1984 issue of Essence magazine – yes, I said Essence—in which Lorde holds his feet to the fire for his own complicity in centering and elevating Black men's experiences above those of Black women. The thing is, though, that Neal's argument would have been perfectly compelling if he had simply focused upon the power of Kanye's art in providing much needed representations of Black male complexity and humanity, without attempting to assess the degree of Kanye's feminism.
And it is Neal's near total misreading of feminism that significantly diminishes the power of his reading. As I understand it, the argument is that because Kanye is not a downright misogynist, he isn't particularly sexist. That's like saying that the only racists, and the only ones we should worry about, are those who are card carrying members of the KKK. Moreover, Neal's assertion that "it would be unfair to say that he is anti-women or that women are treated like indentured servants or worse, three fifths of a person, when they appear in his lyrics and videos" is extremely problematic, as it traffics in the age old notion that racism is worse qualitatively than sexism, that the only mode of oppression is declaring someone 3/5 a person or treating them as an indentured servant. The analogy subtly fails to recognize that all these things were done to women as well. Furthermore, if one objectifies women in one's work, then one has not treated them like a person. So while Kanye cannot be accused of asserting that women are not human beings as the 3/5 compromise did for blacks, both male and female, he arguably could be accused of something worse, namely that given the legacies of blacks and slavery, his rhetoric undermines the hard-fought struggle of Black women to be viewed in their full human complexity, while demanding that we see him in his. In many ways, Neal's argument abides by the same logic. He recognizes that sexism is wrong, but finds it a legitimate to celebrate Kanye's artistic rendering of Black masculine emotional complexity, even if diminishing Black women's struggle against sexism is a prerequisite for doing so. The effect is that Neal reinscribes the very same patriarchal politics that one assumes he'd be against. He asks us as Black women in particular, to lay aside Kanye's maltreatment of us in his work, on the grounds that a.) he isn't as bad as the worst of them and b.) at least we get to see Black men be human. Is this not asking us to subordinate our struggle to the Black male quest for the fullest expression of their personhood?
Finally, I find the reading of Joan Morgan's work largely to be a misreading. While I agree with Neal that Morgan "espoused a very complicated and less than perfect practice of gender progressivism," unlike Kanye, whom the author points out has not "paid homage to any movement among women, black, white, etc," Morgan's text does all that even as she attempts to find a generationally relevant iteration of feminism. Moreover, Morgan does not spend her time in the text going after out right misogynists, though she does call them out. She is absolutely interested in more subtle forms of it, as it plays out in relationships platonic, romantic, and artistic. Neal seems to suggest that what we should conclude from Morgan's book is that "simplistic binaries such as 'man against woman' and 'woman against man' only lead to separatism and loneliness." It sounds as though Neal is suggesting that calling Kanye sexist for videos like the recent and troubling "Monster," is just another instance of Black women frustrating racial progress and fomenting needless insurrection. Moreover, his argument seems to suggest that such outcries against sexism are not only misguided, but the cause of "separatism and loneliness." Based on this logic, when it comes to gender rifts in Black communities, feminism is to blame, rather than sexism.
One of the legacies in Black feminism that I am most proud of is the groundbreaking work on Black masculinity that Black feminism's gender critiques have made room for. This work has given Neal and others the tools and vocabulary to understand and appreciate the kind of masculine performance that West brings to the table. Even so, any proposition which asks Black women to affirm and center Black male complexity while denying and marginalizing our own is everything but feminist.
Chrisette Michele's Recent Photo Shoot with Robert Ector
[Chrisette in red pumps and a soft grey long-sleeved dress, against a window]
"Egyptian state TV reported Sunday morning that the Al Jazeera office in Cairo is being shut down and Al Jazeera reporters are losing their press credentials in Egypt.
Al Jazeera correspondent Dan Nolan tweeted the news at about 11 a.m. local time, adding that Al Jazeera's licenses were revoked, per state media.
Nolan quickly added, "Don't worry we'll still report what's happening in #Egypt no matter what new restrictions they put on us."
Another Al Jazeera employee Evan Hill put the news this way: "State TV announces Al Jazeera's broadcasting license and press cards are being revoked. Our bureau is packing up.""
Whoa, that literally just happened.
Anonymous sources said that today, Sunday, would be the day that Mubarak would quell the protests… aka kill as many people as possible. How can you do that if news sources are monitoring every step?
D O P E
[gorgeous person in white button-down and bowtie, heels, pants in a light green print]
Over 50,000 Sign Petition for Ohio Mother
FUCKING SHIT. FUCKING SSSSSSHITT FUCKING SHIT FUCKING SHIT. You see that up there? That little sentence thrown in there?????? SHE MAY LOSE HER HOME.
THIS IS WHITE FUCKING SUPREMACY. THIS IS HETEROPATRIARCHY. THIS IS CLASSISM. THIS IS NATIONALISM.
(via radicallyhottoff)To all the people of world
The people in Egypt are under governmental siege. Mubarak regime is banning Facebook, Twitter, and all other popular internet sites Now, the internet are completely blocked in Egypt. Tomorrow the government will block the 3 mobile phone network will be completely blocked.
And there is news that even the phone landlines will be cut tomorrow, to prevent any news agency from following what will happen.
Suez city is already under siege now. The government cut the water supply and electricity, people, including, children and elderly are suffering there now. The patients in hospitals cannot get urgent medical care. The injured protesters are lying in the streets and the riot police are preventing people from helping them. The families of the killed protesters cannot get the bodies of their sons to bury them. This picture is the same in north Saini (El-Sheikh zoyad city) and in western Egypt (Al-salom). The riot police is cracking down on protesters in Ismailia, Alexandria, Fayoum, Shbin Elkoum, and Cairo, the capital, in many neighborhoods across the city.
The government is preparing to crackdown on the protesters in all Egyptian cities. They are using tear gas bombs, rubber and plastic pullets, chemicals like dilutes mustard gas against protesters. Several protesters today have been killed when the armored vehicles of the riot police hit them. Officials in plain clothes carrying blades and knives used to intimidate protesters. Thugs deployed by the Egyptian Ministry of Interior are roaming the streets of Cairo, setting fire on car-wheels as means of black propaganda to demonize protesters and justify police beatings and state torture
All this has been taken place over the past three days during the peaceful demonstrations in Cairo and other cities. Now, with the suspicious silence of the local media and the lack of coverage from the international media, Mubarak and his gang are blocking all the channels that can tell the world about what is happening.
People who call for their freedom need your support and help. Will you give them a hand?
The activists are flooding the net (youtube and other sites) with thousands of pictures and videos showing the riot police firing on armless people. The police started to use ammunition against protesters. 15-year old girl has been injured and another 25 year old man has been shot in the mouth. While nothing of these has appeared in the media, there is more to happen tomorrow. Will you keep silent? Will you keep your mouth shut while seeing all these cruelty and inhumane actions?
We don't ask for much, just broadcast what is happeningAlicia Ali Marsden
Fuck Yes. Where is this shirt and Where can I buy it?
WANT.
[photo of of a person in grey cardigan and black t-shirt, yellow letters: CAUTION ~ educated student of color]
"People act like Black girls are born with a little tube of relaxer & a note that says, 'My bad.'– God."
This quote has been circulating around Twitter. I don't know who originally came up with it, if you do feel free to let me know :)
BUTCH Voices (August 18 - 22nd) should be on this list
The mission of BUTCH Voices is to enhance and sustain the well-being of all women, female-bodied, and trans-identified individuals who are masculine of center*. We achieve this by providing programs that build community, positive visibility and empower us to advocate for our whole selves inclusive of and beyond our gender identity and sexual orientation.
Our community is vast and growing and we have many identifications that resemble what the world knows as our "butchness." We recognize our diversity as having a foundation rooted in butch heritage. We welcome the on-going development of movements intentionally and critically inclusive of our gender variant community. BUTCH Voices is a social justice organization that is race and gender inclusive, pro-womanist and feminist. [-bLaK.]
2011 Confirmed Conferences
First Event – 31st Annual!
First Event is one of the largest transgender conferences, welcoming everyone from the transgender community and our supporters: crossdressers, transsexuals, intersex individuals, M2Fs, F2Ms, and their significant others are all welcome….
amazed how quick erasure takes place.
California Latinos protest Arizona push to end birthright citizenship - By the CNN Wire staff
You have got to be kidding me.
From the first two paragraphs of the wikipedia page for Sí se puede.:
Sí, se puede (Spanish for "Yes, it is possible" or, roughly, "Yes, it can be done"[1]) is the motto of the United Farm Workers. In 1972, during Cesar Chavez's 24 day fast in Phoenix, Arizona, he and UFW's co-founder, Dolores Huerta came up with the slogan.[1]
The phrase has been widely adopted by other labor unions and civil rights organizations and drew widespread political and media attention as a rallying cry during the 2006 U.S. immigration reform protests.[2][3]
This is what cultural appropriation looks like, if you're ever in need of an example.
(via sexartandpolitics)
^^^
(via healingsakina
)
And I just am convinced these jackasses don't read anything not written by white folks
(via blackamazon)
I knew the phrase before the Obama campaign, but I never knew about it being from any political movement. Let alone anything as important as United Farm Worker and labor unions.
And it's kind of hilariously terrible to me now, remembering how I did learn the phrase: from Disney! Yup. Good ol' Disney used it in a tv movie called, "Gotta Kick It Up." I remember cuz I was confused on how 'si se puede' meant 'yes WE can.' (I hadn't taken formal spanish classes yet).
But yeah, perfect example of appropriation and imperialism and commercialization and everything else terrible. Thanks for schoolin me on what these words actually stand for.
(via liquornspice)
William Loren Katz, "Africans and Indians: Only in America"
Filippa Maria Aranha has kind of become my new hero. I wish I could find more info about her.